• <center id="my6c6"></center>
    <rt id="my6c6"><acronym id="my6c6"></acronym></rt>
  • <abbr id="my6c6"></abbr>
  •  

    上海強世信息科技有限公司

    Placebo response changes depending on the neuropathic pain syndrome: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis
    作者: | 發(fā)布:Cepeda MS, Berlin JA, Gao CY, Wiegand F, Wada DR. | 發(fā)布時間: 2012-04-13 | 295 次瀏覽 | 分享到:
    Objective: To compare placebo responses in neuropathic pain syndromes.

    Design: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

    Setting and patients: Randomized placebo-controlled trials assessing pain intensity or pain relief in any neuropathic pain syndrome published since 1995 with ≥5days follow-up.

    Interventions: Placebo response.

    Outcome measures: Pain intensity and responder rates (proportion reporting ≥50% pain relief). Meta-regression models were built.

    Results: Ninety-four studies (N=5,317) were included in the pain intensity analysis; 47 studies (N=3,087) were included in the responder analysis. After controlling for potential confounders (e.g., subject characteristics, study design characteristics), the placebo response was found to be large and varied with the pain syndrome. Compared with diabetic neuropathic/polyneuropathic pain (DPN), the placebo response for a decline in pain intensity and responder rate was smaller in trials that assessed central pain and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) and larger in trials that assessed HIV pain. The model-predicted mean decrease (95% confidence interval [CI]) from baseline in pain intensity (0-10 scale) was as follows: DPN, 1.45 (1.35 to 1.55); PHN, 1.16 (1.03 to 1.29); central pain, 0.44 (-0.41 to 1.30); HIV pain, 1.82 (1.51 to 2.12). The predicted responder rates (95% CI) were as follows: DPN, 20% (14.6 to 25.8); PHN, 11.5% (8.4 to 14.5); central pain, 7.2% (2.1 to 12.3); HIV pain, 42.8% (34.9 to 50.7). The type of treatment in the active arm also influenced the placebo response.

    Conclusions: Placebo response is influenced by the pain syndrome evaluated. These differences should be considered when evaluating novel compounds for the treatment of neuropathic pain conditions.

    Pain Med. 2012 Apr;13(4):575-95.

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22390269/

    久久久久久久综合色一本| 久久青青草原精品国产不卡| 好好的曰com久久| 免费久久人人爽人人爽av| 久久777国产线看观看精品卜| 亚洲精品WWW久久久久久| 久久久久成人精品免费播放动漫 | 伊人久久婷婷五月综合97色| 国产国产成人久久精品| 日韩AV无码久久一区二区 | 少妇高潮喷潮久久久影院| 91精品久久久久久久久网影视| 亚洲国产成人久久综合区| 久久只有这里有精品4| 韩国无遮挡三级久久| 少妇高潮惨叫久久久久久电影| 久久久久一区二区三区| 久久亚洲精品11p| 77777_亚洲午夜久久多人| 久久亚洲国产精品| 久久久久久综合一区中文字幕| 国产精品美女久久久久av爽| 无码综合天天久久综合网| 亚洲国产精品无码久久| 99久久99久久久精品齐齐| 久久中文字幕人妻熟av女| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片AV不| 久久久久久久国产免费看| 一本久久A久久免费精品不卡 | 无码伊人66久久大杳蕉网站谷歌| 亚洲午夜久久久影院| 中文国产成人精品久久下载| 国产69精品久久久久APP下载| 91久久精品午夜一区二区| 日产精品久久久久久久| 一本久久a久久精品综合夜夜| 久久青草亚洲AV无码麻豆| 亚洲精品无码久久久| 亚洲国产成人久久精品99| 国产成人精品久久亚洲高清不卡 | 成人久久久观看免费毛片|